Research|Scholarship Facts — народные рассказы & Posrednik

extracts

Scholarship Facts — народные рассказы & Posrednik

Last modified 10 August 2026 · view source

Gap-fill + reception research pass. Each fact carries a source; unresolvable items are flagged UNRESOLVED. Sources aggregated in ## Sources at the end. Compiled 2026-06-11 from: PSS Tom 25 apparatus (PSS-25-commentary), Chertkov letters sweep (_sweep_letters_chertkov.md), Istomin letters (v90_036/037), tolstoy.ru, Wikipedia, Robert C. Otto dissertation metadata, and targeted web searches.


1. Posrednik founding chronology

Stage 1 — the Moscow meetings, 1883–early 1884. The «Канва жизни Толстого» (Tolstoy Museum / Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, 1928, p. 25) fixes December 1883 as the moment when Tolstoy’s plan for «издание книг для образования русских людей» first crystallised — labelled in the PSS apparatus as «первое зерно “Посредника”».

In late January–February 1884 Tolstoy convened «несколько совещаний» at his Khamovniki house. Attendees identified in the apparatus include M. P. Shchepkin (Moscow city Duma member, later typographer), V. N. Marakuev (publisher, founded «Народная библиотека» 1882), R. A. Pisarev (Tula zemstvo activist), N. N. Zlatovratsky, and S. A. Usov. For one of these meetings Tolstoy drafted his programmatic «Речь о народных изданиях» (PSS 25:523–529 and apparatus 874–879). Pisarev described the meeting in a letter to Chertkov of 7 February 1884: «Третьего дня у него, Толстого, было собрание людей, сочувствующих этому делу; на первый раз Толстой собрал человек десять, но в этот вечер ни к чему окончательному еще не пришли» (AChertkov archive, cited PSS-25 apparatus p. 876).

Tolstoy to Chertkov, end of February 1884: «Моё занятие книгами больше и больше захватывает меня» (PSS 85:30). The speech itself is PSS vol. 25, pp. 523–529; apparatus pp. 874–879.

Note: Chertkov had first met Tolstoy in October 1883; the speech/meetings predate the formal Chertkov–Sytin operational agreement by roughly a year.

Stage 2 — Chertkov–Sytin agreement, autumn/winter 1884. The PSS Chertkov-letters footnote to v85_048 (28 February 1885) preserves Chertkov’s own words in a telegram note: «Через неделю должны быть готовы все рисунки к лубочным книжечкам и обе большие картины. Тогда отвезу их сам опять к Сытину, так как очень важно, чтобы первые издания вышли хорошо во всех подробностях.» This places the Chertkov–Sytin handover of the first booklets in late February/early March 1885, just before the spring 1885 publication run. The Free Dictionary / Great Soviet Encyclopedia article on Posrednik states the house was «founded in St. Petersburg in 1884 on the initiative of L. N. Tolstoy and headed by V. G. Chertkov»; Wikipedia (Vladimir Chertkov article) gives 1885 for Chertkov «organis[ing] and financ[ing]» it. The discrepancy (1884 vs 1885) reflects: 1884 = planning/agreement phase; 1885 = first publications.

The most concrete pre-launch institutional snapshot is the Chertkov telegram note (PSS 85:48 footnote): lubok booklet drawings and two large картины nearing completion, Chertkov personally managing Sytin delivery «to ensure quality» (PSS apparatus, _sweep_letters_chertkov.md entry for v85_048).

Stage 3 — first four booklets, spring 1885. From the PSS Tom 25 apparatus (per-tale commentary entries): - «Чем люди живы?» — censorship approved 3 March 1885 (censor Назаревский); published spring 1885 with 4 Repin illustrations (PSS-25-commentary §1). - «Где любовь, там и Бог» — censorship approved 24 May 1885 (PSS-25-commentary §5). - «Два брата и золото» and «Ильяс» — approved in the same December 1885–February 1886 batch (PSS-25-commentary §3, §4), so these are slightly later than the first two. - «Два старика» — text approved 4 October 1885, cover 17 October 1885 (PSS-25-commentary §12).

The precise «first four» as a simultaneous release is not pinned to a single date in the available apparatus. The first two definitively out in spring 1885 are «Чем люди живы?» and «Где любовь, там и Бог»; the картины series (Искушение Христа / Страдания Господа) received censorship approval 3–4 March 1885 and were also among the initial Posrednik print run.

Sources: PSS-25-commentary; _sweep_letters_chertkov.md (v85_048 footnote; v85_049; v85_054; v85_065); tolstoy.ru/creativity/journalismguide/98.php (speech 1884 entry).


2. Circulation / sales figures

Multiple independent sources give large but slightly varying figures:

Best-sourced figure for planning purposes: ~12 million copies in the first four years (Soviet encyclopaedia, itself drawing on Gorbunov-Posadov’s internal records); the 20 million figures likely cover a longer period (1885–1891 or 1885–1894).

Sources: encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Posrednik+Publishing+House; v85_059 (_sweep_letters_chertkov.md); v85_060; ditext.com Tolstoy article; Otto 1983 (metadata only).


3. «Детский отдых» — first publication of «Чем люди живы», December 1881

Journal: «Детский отдых» (Children’s Rest / Children’s Leisure), No. 12, December 1881. Illustrations by N. A. Kiselyov. Source: PSS-25-commentary §1 (apparatus p. 665).

V. K. Istomin’s role: Vladimir Konstantinovich Istomin was the editor of «Детский отдых» at this period. Two Tolstoy letters to him survive (PSS vol. 90, pp. 247): - v90_036 (c. 1 December 1881): Tolstoy writes «Я переменил не больше 20 строк во всем, но они очень нужны, особенно в конце» — handing back the corrected manuscript. «Надеюсь на ваше умное и тонкое отношение к этому моему писанью и вверяюсь вам.» - v90_037 (4 December 1881): Tolstoy replies to Istomin’s editorial query about an illustration detail («Синий карандаш на портках не мой, и исключить их потому нельзя, что тогда ангел будет без порток»), written on Istomin’s own letter.

These two notes confirm that Istomin edited the tale for «Детский отдых» and that Tolstoy was personally involved in final copy corrections in early December 1881, consistent with the December 1881 issue date.

P. A. Bers: No evidence in the extracted primary sources of P. A. Bers having an editorial role at «Детский отдых» for this publication. Tatyana Andreevna Bers (later Kuzmínskaya), Tolstoy’s sister-in-law, is associated with Yasnaya Polyana domestic life in this period but not with the journal’s editorial apparatus. UNRESOLVED: whether Bers had any involvement beyond Istomin.

Sources: v90_036_V_K_Istominu.txt; v90_037_V_K_Istominu.txt (PSS vol. 90, p. 247); PSS-25-commentary §1 (PSS 25:665).


4. The 1887 censorship wave

«Чем люди живы?» — Arrested 4 February 1887 by the Moscow Censorship Committee on denunciation by K. P. Pobedonostsev (Ober-Procurator of the Holy Synod). Subsequent editions banned 1887 and 1888. Only freely circulated after 1905. Source: PSS-25-commentary §1 (apparatus p. 665).

«Сказка об Иване-дураке» — First published by Posrednik, censorship approved April 1886. 2nd edition arrested February 1887; banned 1887, 1892, 1893. Freely circulated only from 1906. The surviving censor Tikhonov’s written verdict condemns the tale for «вредное для государства» content and anti-military sentiment. Source: PSS-25-commentary §16 (apparatus p. 715–719).

Both arrests thus fall in February 1887, consistent with a coordinated Pobedonostsev- instigated action. The PSS apparatus explicitly names Pobedonostsev as instigator for «Чем люди живы?»; for Ivan the Fool the apparatus attributes the ban to censor Tikhonov acting under the same political pressure.

The Hapgood 1887 article (marxists.org/archive/tolstoy/about/1887/count-tolstoi-and- the-public-censor.html) documents censorship of the Moscow Census piece and vol. XII of Tolstoy’s collected works from the same period, but does not detail the Posrednik- specific arrests — UNRESOLVED for independent English-language corroboration of the exact February 1887 date beyond PSS apparatus.

Sources: PSS-25-commentary §1 and §16; Otto 1983 (dissertation, paywalled — mentions «confiscation of materials and fines on distributors» by early 1890s); en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Vladimir_Chertkov (confirms censorship pressure on Posrednik).


5. Ban/permission dates and translation data — six key workRecords

5a. «Чем люди живы?» / What Men Live By

5b. «Где любовь, там и Бог» / Where Love Is, God Is (Martin the Cobbler)

5c. «Два старика» / Two Old Men

5d. «Много ли человеку земли нужно?» / How Much Land Does a Man Need?

5e. «Сказка об Иване-дураке» / Ivan the Fool

5f. «Три старца» / The Three Hermits


6. Alchevskaya’s «Что читать народу?» and peasant reactions

Khristina Danilovna Alchevskaya (1841–1920) ran the Kharkov Women’s Sunday School and compiled the multi-volume critical bibliography «Что читать народу?» (What to Read to the People). Volume I appeared in 1884; the complete three-volume set spanned 1884–1906. The work won the grand prize at the Paris International Exhibition (1889). It functioned as a «Критический указатель книг для народного и детского чтения» (critical index of books for popular and children’s reading), drawing on real audience responses from her Sunday-school literacy classes where pupils — predominantly working- class women and peasants — were asked to react to texts read aloud.

Tolstoy’s folk tales in «Что читать народу?»: Alchevskaya’s school is documented as testing texts on a peasant/working-class audience in the 1880s. The Wikipedia article on Alchevska (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khrystyna_Alchevska) does not specify Tolstoy’s folk tales among the tested items, but Vol. I (1884) predates most Posrednik publications and so would engage mainly «Чем люди живы?» (published «Детский отдых» 1881) and early Marakuev editions. Vol. II–III (published later in the series) more likely contain responses to the Posrednik tales.

UNRESOLVED: the specific peasant-reader reactions to Tolstoy’s folk tales as recorded by Alchevskaya. This requires direct access to the volumes — not available via open web sources. The Cambridge Tolstoy in Context chapter «Peasants and Folklore» (Chapter 5, Cambridge University Press, DOI via cambridge.org/core) and Ben Eklof, Russian Peasant Schools (UC Press, 1986) are the recommended secondary channels for this evidence.

Sources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khrystyna_Alchevska; books.openedition.org/ledizioni/13174 (lower-class reading survey); cambridge.org/core/books/abs/tolstoy-in-context/peasants- and-folklore/ (chapter abstract, paywalled).


7. Writers recruited to Posrednik

A. N. Ostrovsky

Tolstoy wrote a formal appeal to Ostrovsky via Chertkov (November 1886, letter v85_121, full text quoted in footnote). Tolstoy’s appeal states Posrednik’s mission: «Наша цель издавать то, что доступно, нужно, понятно всем, а не маленькому кругу людей, и имеет нравственное содержание, согласное с духом учения Христа.» Ostrovsky died June 1886 before responding — he did not contribute to Posrednik. Source: _sweep_letters_chertkov.md §A. N. Ostrovsky; v85_121.

N. S. Leskov

Leskov became close to Tolstoy in the mid-1880s; first meeting 25 April 1887 (Leskov’s request to visit noted in Wikipedia, Nikolai Leskov article). Tolstoy endorsed a Leskov article for Posrednik in January 1887 (v86_130): «Статья Лескова, кроме языка, в котором чувствуется искусственность, превосходна. И по мне, ничего в ней изменять не надо, а все средства употребить, чтобы её напечатать у нас как есть. Это превосходная вещь.»

Specific Leskov titles published by Posrednik / I. D. Sytin in the 1880s–90s: - «Совестный Данила» — published by Sytin, 1890, with illustrations by I. E. Repin (confirmed by search results citing Moscow printing-house Sytin & Co.). - «Фигура» — published by Sytin, 1890 (confirmed by search results). - «Скоморох Памфалон» — first published «Исторический вестник», March 1887; collected May 1887. Closely associated with the Posrednik/Tolstoyan milieu (Leskov changed the title to obscure the religious source). - «Христос в гостях у мужика» — Christmas story in the Posrednik spirit; published independently (confirmed by multiple Russian library sources).

The Leskov article praised by Tolstoy in v86_130 is not identified by title in the available extract. Specific Posrednik catalogue numbers for Leskov titles — UNRESOLVED (requires Otto 1983 dissertation or Posrednik internal catalogue).

Sources: _sweep_letters_chertkov.md §N. S. Leskov; v86_130 (footnote); vita.org.ru Фигура; cyberleninka.ru Скоморох Памфалон article; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Leskov.

V. M. Garshin

Vsevolod Garshin is named as a Posrednik contributor in the Wikipedia Chertkov article («The publication attracted … Garshin»). The PSS-25 apparatus (§15, v25_713_714) notes that Garshin «also wrote a description of the same painting» (Bouguereau’s Passion) at the same time as Tolstoy wrote the Posrednik caption text — confirming parallel activity in the Posrednik circle c. 1885. Specific Garshin title(s) published by Posrednik: UNRESOLVED — no title confirmed in available sources. Sources: PSS-25-commentary §15; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Chertkov.

V. G. Korolenko

Named as a Posrednik contributor in the Wikipedia Chertkov article. No specific title recovered in available sources. UNRESOLVED. Sources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Chertkov.

A. I. Ertel

«Рассказы Ивана Федотыча» — accepted for Posrednik (v86_215, February 1889; published 1891). Mentioned in Chertkov letters sweep. Source: _sweep_letters_chertkov.md §A. I. Ertel.


8. Contemporary critical reception in the thick journals

N. K. Mikhailovsky is documented as having written essays on Tolstoy’s short fiction (cited in multiple sources: Sorokin, Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism, Ohio State University Press; literariness.org analysis). Mikhailovsky, the leading Populist (народнический) critic of «Отечественные записки» and «Русское богатство», was skeptical of Tolstoy’s post-crisis «moralising» turn. His critique centred on what he called Tolstoy’s retreat from social analysis into religious didacticism — the folk tales embodied this tendency.

Specific text and date of Mikhailovsky’s review of the народные рассказы: UNRESOLVED. The most accessible secondary account is in Sorokin’s Ohio State Press monograph and in Boris Eikhenbaum’s Tolstoy studies. Direct access to «Отечественные записки» / «Русское богатство» 1885–87 runs required.

A. M. Skabichevsky is similarly cited among critics of the period who engaged Tolstoy’s new direction. Specific verdict on the folk tales: UNRESOLVED.

What can be said: the Populist critical camp broadly objected that the tales substituted Christian resignation for social critique of the conditions producing peasant poverty — precisely the opposite of what the Populist programme demanded of literature. This critical tension is documented in secondary literature (Eikhenbaum; Sorokin) though specific 1885–87 review texts are not recoverable via open sources in this search.

Sources: ohiostatepress.org/books/BookPages/SorokinTolstoy.html; literariness.org /analysis-of-leo-tolstoys-stories/.


9. Church reaction beyond censorship

Direct Synod/clergy statements specifically targeting the folk tales: UNRESOLVED via open sources. What is established:

No formal Synod resolution or metropolitan’s pastoral letter specifically naming the народные рассказы has been located. UNRESOLVED: specific Synod statement text and date.

Sources: PSS-25-commentary §1 (Pobedonostsev); PSS-25-commentary §17 (spiritual censorship 24 Feb 1886); PSS 25:874 apparatus (Pashkov precedent); en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Chertkov.


10. International reception — early translations and German request

English reception

German reception

Sources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Hermits (Dole 1887 date); en.wikipedia.org /wiki/What_Men_Live_By (Lothrop c.1886); standardebooks.org translators page; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Empty_Drum; amazon.com Dole collections.


Summary of resolution status

# Gap Status
1 Posrednik founding chronology (speech → Sytin agreement → first booklets) RESOLVED (PSS apparatus + letters)
2 Circulation/sales figures RESOLVED (12M/4yr best-sourced; 20M variants noted)
3 «Детский отдых» Dec 1881 editor: Istomin confirmed RESOLVED (v90_036/037); P. A. Bers role UNRESOLVED
4 1887 censorship wave: both Feb 1887 arrests confirmed RESOLVED (PSS apparatus)
5a What Men Live By — pub, ban, Dole translation RESOLVED
5b Where Love Is — pub (May 1885); no ban; first EN translation date PARTIAL (first EN UNRESOLVED)
5c Two Old Men — pub (Oct 1885); no ban; first EN translation date PARTIAL (first EN UNRESOLVED)
5d How Much Land — pub (Apr 1886 Русское богатство); Dole/Maude RESOLVED
5e Ivan the Fool — pub (Apr 1886); bans confirmed; earliest EN PARTIAL (earliest EN UNRESOLVED)
5f Three Hermits — pub (Нива 1886 No.13); Dole 1887 EN RESOLVED
6 Alchevskaya field studies / peasant reactions UNRESOLVED (paywalled)
7 Writers recruited: Ostrovsky (died, no contribution), Leskov (titles partly confirmed), Garshin/Korolenko (named, no titles), Ertel PARTIAL
8 Critical reception: Mikhailovsky/Skabichevsky verdict texts UNRESOLVED (journal runs required)
9 Church/Synod statement on folk tales specifically UNRESOLVED
10 International reception: EN Dole 1887 confirmed; German Барабан request PARTIAL (German request UNRESOLVED)

Resolved: 7 | Partial: 5 | Unresolved: 5


Sources